Monday, November 12, 2007

The Power of One

Crossposted at Them's My Sentiments

In early October I had an unfortunate experience at a local branch of Danier Leather. In the course of a blog post mainly about agism I described this incident, and in the Comments to the post several readers advised that I should write to the company to complain. This seemed like a good idea and so I wrote a letter to the local store and one to the president of the company (always go to the top). My commenters had asked me to let them know what was happening and I therefore posted a copy of the letter to the president as a follow up.

The next morning I had an email in my inbox from the Call Centre Operations manager; it seems that the company does a frequent search of the Web for mentions of its name and that of its president (which is why I am not naming him here). The email apologised for the incident, assured me that there would be follow-up and asked that I call the writer. When I did, we had a good conversation about what I had written and why, I apologised for posting the letter before snailmailing it and I was offered a gift as an apology.

All very nice. What really intrigued me, however, was the speed of the response and the fact that the company was trolling the internet for references to its name. Some of my comment writers had included incidents of their own in which they had complained about service, with varying results. But I defy anyone to cite a faster response than the one I have just described.

All of which is a preface to the main theme of this post, which is the power of using the internet. It never occurred to me that the Danier Leather people would pick up a reference to themselves in a blog. Search engines are amazing tools. I know that some of you have visit counters of more or less sophistication, some of which track what search words were used to get the visitor to your site, some of which track where the visitor comes from, and much more. I just have a simple hit counter but I am contemplating an upgrade now. And so that is Question Number One -- do you have a sophisticated counter and if so, what does it tell you about your visitors and how do you make use of the information?

Question Number Two is this -- have you written a complaint about any company by name (as opposed to writing to the company) and if you have, what kind of response did you get? As I said earlier, I was absolutely amazed by the speed with which my complaint was picked up. As well, I was impressed with how seriously they took it. It makes me wonder if other big companies are internet savvy and have a protocol for responding to mentions of them. And if so, what kind of companies they are. Danier is a provider of luxury goods; would this make them more complaints sensitive than someone like Sears or Walmart?

Third and last, I find myself thinking hard about how this power could be harnessed and used to address some of the issues that BlogRhet contributors are concerned with. Things like lack of sensitivity in advertising or child unfriendly retail outlets (I know of a coffee shop that did not have a baby changing table in the washroom, for goodness sake) or staff. Things like lack of respect (basic good manners!) for the poor slobs who are spending the money. Julie Pippert did a good post on that one on her home site. I, for one, am completely sick of grocery checkout staff who chat with a co-worker while scanning and bagging my purchases. The local grocery where I shop has a complaints station and posts the complaint, plus answer, on the wall at the front of the store. There's no such facility in most of the big chains. But there is the internet, hmm?

If this kind of thing interests you, could you give some thought to the questions. If you have done post(s) about similar things, could you drop off a link, please. I'd really like to hear your ideas and if I get some good ones, do a follow up post on the topic.

Thanks!

Mary G

12 comments:

Christine said...

i've never talked about a complaint on my blog.

i am impressed that the company found you!

MommyK said...

Anybody who is in the business of making money knows how powerful word of mouth is. It's even more powerful when the experience has been bad. Think about it. How often do you make a recommendation based on good service? And when you have a bad experience, how many people do you tell? That's why I think really good companies make the effort to fix the damage and why you got such a quick response from your post.

I'm also interested in a more sophisticated counter, because someone has been following my friends and I around the internet and leaving nasty anonymous comments. I'm pretty sure I know who it is, but it would be nice to know for sure.

Great post!

painted maypole said...

i have a lame counter, but do wonder about the more sophisticated ones (but I have no money to pay for it, so whatever...) i also have not filed any really complaints, other than my rant against RoseArt crayons. so I have very little to say, I guess. ;)

Mary G said...

Christine and Maypole, the fact that you don't see your blog as useful that way is really relevant to the concept. Neither did I, until it jumped out and bit me on the behind, so to speak.
Mommyk, yes! So do I. What I would love to know is how many companies are trolling the net to prevent complaint spread.
And yes, good counters are pricy. Sigh.

gingajoy said...

That really is fascinating, Mary. I've never had that experience, and don't tend to name products in my blog--although I have once or twice. Other bloggers I know have been contacted by companies when they have posted on a particular product--especially a household 'mom' one. They've also been sent freebies, ostensibly in the hopes that the blogger will then post about the experience. This is the other side to all of this, I guess, that our social capital can be leveraged for advertising and such--there are pros and cons to this, as we've discussed here. I think there are examples of exactly the type of thing you're talking about--where networks of bloggers are getting heard on social issues and response from corporations.

I wonder if the company you referred to would be hoping that you'd counter the post with something positive. Interesting to ponder all the possibilities here, certainly.

gingajoy said...

to answer your questions about Stat counters and such--no, I don't tend to pay attention to these things. However, if I was thinking more seriously about how to leverage my blog, I know it would be critical to invest in a more sophisticated counter that tracked traffic and IPs.

bubandpie said...

I use SiteMeter, which is free, and it does show me the referring URLs, but I have to comb through the visits to see the patterns - I'd love to have the ability to track at a glance exactly how many hits I'm getting from each source (especially Google hits) - but I'm not willing to PAY for that service.

DaniGirl said...

Oh, I could go on for days about this... my day job is in communications, studying this whole social media thing from a corporate perspective. And yes, companies are watching the blogs for product mentions (and so are governments, by the way.) Some tech companies, like Dell computers, employ people to scan the blogosphere all day long and respond to comments, criticisms and concerns. (See http://www.buzzmachine.com/?tag=dell for a good case study.)

I've seen URLs from the Frito Lay Company and Proctor and Gamble show up in my referral logs after writing posts or rants about them, and actually scored a free trip to Smugglers' Notch this summer when they caught my blogged trip to Bar Harbor in their "family vacation" Google Alert. All that to say, it's the naive and oblivious company that is NOT monitoring what the bloggers are saying!

As far as stat counters are concerned, Google Analytics is top of the line and free - but a little bit complex. I personally like AddFreeStats (http://www.addfreestats.com/) and SiteMeter (www.sitemeter.com), but if you go with SiteMeter, make sure you ask to be put on their server that does NOT participate in SpecificClick, which is a tracking/spyware cookie that Sitemeter started adding to its accounts this past summer. (It follows users after they read your blog and reports back on your click habits.)

Phew, sorry for the long comment... and I've only scratched the surface. You've covered a couple of topics dear to my heart, obviously!

Mary G said...

Joy, yes I am sure they were. And I did, as was fair. There are a lot of possibilities -- I would love to have a story from someone who has got freebies for citing a product.
Danigirl, many thanks for the info and I will de specificclick my SiteMaster. I wondered what those cookies were! Bubandpie, take note. How did the Smuggers' Notch thing happen, Dani? And please do weigh in again and often on this; I think it is a very important topic.

I wonder if we could leverage some good site data, somehow, without getting tied up to the provider. Nice dream, I guess.

Thanks, you all!

Click Here to See It said...

Are you part of the revolution?

Maddy said...

About a decade ago I was pretty vigilant about writing letter of complaint for anything that was really bad. I always had responses, sometimes a replacement whatever, sometimes a money off voucher for the next purchase. Unfortunately I don't have the time any more I just seeth silently.
Cheers

Click here to see it said...

Are you part of the revolution?