If you really want to put the zap on your blogging mojo, you should rush out and read The Cult Of The Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture, by Andrew Keen.
I was cleaning the bathrooms and listening to our local public radio station (very, very glamorous, no?), when Keen was on air discussing how blogging is going to destroy the world.
The glut of unprofessional (his word, not mine) writing, journalism and criticism out in the blogosphere is slowly chipping away at the centralized "cultures" of the western world.
He cites very specific statistics about the number of blogs being created each minute - an impossibly large and daunting number - and how this cacophony makes it impossible for us, as cultural and media consumers, to make informed decisions about our consumption of literature, film, radio, television, news and every other aspect of the cultural spectrum.
Keen's theory is that we are reducing the people who once were the arbiters of our cultural world to pink slips, with trained critics, authors, filmmakers and newsroom employees being laid off in droves while we "monkeys with a million typewriters" bang out a bunch of crap.
I take issue with some of what Keen theorizes, and I haven't yet finished the book. And ironically, for someone who makes a strong case that blogging causes a cultural apocalypse, Keen seems to have no problem hyping his tome on - you guessed it - his Typepad blog.
However, in some ways, I can see his point.
It takes time, he says, to weed through the gazillion blogs out there and find the ones you want to read, the ones that are of value to you. Time is our most precious commodity, and where once we were able to find our information in specific, expected areas of media, now we are sometimes lost in the vast digital forest.
Yup.
I can buy that.
And I, my friends, am one of those trees obstructing your view.
I got this cool template and I put ads on my site and - I can admit it here, among friends - I got awfully cocky.
I started writing for you.
I began to assume what you wanted to read. How you wanted to be directed. What you wanted to think.
Shame on me.
I am trained in this profession, that is a fact, and so Keen cannot really accuse me of being an amateur.
I am a paid professional in the world of letters, and I earned that privilege through an arduous, costly education and a tremendous amount of personal effort and hard work.
But you don't pay me.
You come here voluntarily. You are a community, not a commodity.
I apologize for mistaking the two.
Making deliberate editorial decisions about what I will or will not write about is not appropriate for this forum. You are not looking for an expert - and I think we can all agree that I offere no parenting and/or life expertise.
Traffic is nice, sure. The small profit I see from the ads in my sidebar is helpful, and does not go unnoticed in my checking account. After all, both my husband and I are, essentially, unemployed.
But that is not why I started writing Chicken And Cheese.
So I will henceforth be writing here as I used to write over here - as if no one was reading.
As if I were writing for myself.
I hope you still want to come along with me.
Monday, October 8, 2007
Back To Basics
Labels:
art versus commerce,
blogging,
books,
community,
culture,
intellectual property,
media,
meta,
writing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
45 comments:
I have only just found your blog Mrs Chicken and I love it for what you write. Your context is great.
I may not comment on every blog you post but I do like to read what you have to say! I only wish my blog was as good as yours! I hope you keep doing what you do best!
Forget what anyone else has to say!
At least you are expanding your mind while cleaning the toilet. Multi-tasker!
Thanks, Mrs. Chicken!
It's that B word again, isn't it? Balance. As bloggers we want readers and get caught up in providing what readers want. I know I have, but I promise myself to write what I want to write, whether it's serious or silly, meaningless or meaningful, no matter what. Then if no one reads it, well, I did not write it for them anyway! I wrote about soap operas today. Not your riveting blog fodder.
I've been doing a lot of weeding this year, and you certainly will stay on as one of my favorite flowers. Love to you and every word you've ever written for us.
I am fairly new to the blogosphere and have been really blown away by the incredibly talented bloggers out there. They are WRITERS. Damn good ones.
The lure of getting traffic or wanting readers is always there, but when you are writing true to yourself that is when your readers can feel it. That is what they come back for. To feel that again. Thanks for showing up on the page.
That sounds like an interesting book. I agree that this blogging thing can suck up a lot of valuable time. But I think the returns are pretty good in terms of community formed and the opportunity to debate, support, and educate eachother.
Well - if my opinion is worth a jot - I think you write wonderfully, and am very glad I found your blog.
I read your words out of choice. I sought out your blog, and will continue to do so.
Keep writing.
Blogging is a time suck, no question about it. But so are lots of other things like talking on the phone, watching TV or listening to music. What I like about it is that it is both a solitary act, and one which builds community--hard to find that combination!
Keen's ideas are provocative - but I can't imagine that blogging really replaces the function of professional reviewers. Most of the books I read these days are ones I've heard about through blogging - but that means that I read more books, not that I'm now ignoring reviewers. I still read professional movie reviews, but a positive review from a blogger is more likely to motivate me to actually arrange babysitting so hubby and I can go.
Argh, I guess I can see his point but the idea that there should only be some select arbiters of our cultural world gets my hackles up. Perhaps that's because I'm one of the amateurs. Nobody likes to be thought of as mediocre.
I completely understand what you mean about writing for your audience though. I find myself guilty of it at times. Or feel guilty if I write about something I know will make my readers uncomfortable. There's something wrong with that.
I think the weeding out process happens pretty well in this cyber world. I found your blog and I couldn't be happier that I choose to visit it. Daily. OK, hourly.
peace.
Hmmmm. I just don't know what to say. There is a lot of crap out there in the blogsphere --but we all have free choice to read or not read.
I guess the real tragedy is when a good blogger is swayed but what he/she thinks people want to read. But isn't that what newspapers and news channels do all the time?
Interesting.
"monkeys with a million typewriters"
Oh now, I do lurve me some monkeys.
Dr. Professor Monkey Britches says that Mr. Keen has been scratching & sniffing WAY to many monkey butts and has lost his touch on reality. Which isn't real anyway....reality that is.
Dr. Professor Monkey Britches would also like to caution Mr. Keen on talking out of both sides of his mouth....you know, flinging poop at the blogosphere and while having his own blog. That type of snobbery & dichotomy in life will lead to insanity.
there is something so very irritating about the assumption that we are so very lost without "arbiters"-I suppose it's far too much to assume that we, the readers, might actually discern for ourselves what we wish to see and read.
I've heard the whining about how bloggers (and the internet) are ruining modern culture, and to me it seems like the dying gasps of a group of people made obsolete. Knowledge, and it's medium is changing-as are the people who are reading it and making it.
I think that making the choices about what we read and what we don't, the information that we value and that we cast aside is one of the more valuable skills in today's society. If reading blogs helps to hone that skill, so much the better.
I have never thought that you weren't writing for yourself?
I'm not a professional writer, don't claim to be one. I'm also not particularly "cultured", but I think blogging has really expanded my world, my experiences. I don't really see Keen's point. Those people who have something interesting to say will be read, those who don't...won't. Technology and the internet ARE a part of our culture, blogs or no blogs.
Theodora, I tend to agree with you - a culture is pretty much made up of what the populace decides it is interested in, IMHO. Also, as far as writing for me, I mostly do, yes. But the temptation to start writing with, what is for me, a less authentic voice is there once those numbers start rolling in. You know what I mean?
I find the irony just exquisite that he has a typepad account.
We're still in the midst of the cultural sea change that blogging is bringing about - with both good and bad aspects, I suppose.
What a great post. I don't think I want to read his book, though. I'll just wait for your review.
I found your article about this book interesting enough to look into his book a little more. Doesn't that make it free advertisment for him? The blogs I read are well-written (this one!) and entertaining. Honestly, some people do write jibberish, but who reads them?
He sounds like a bitter writer who is having a hard time getting gigs.
The assumption he makes (the fatal flaw?) is that bloggers are one great undifferentiated mass of mediocrity.
But in the blogosphere, as everywhere, there are talented writers, middling writers, and truly terrible writers.
He's making a lot of fuss over nothing, IMO.
Will I? How could I not come back again and again? I think this sort of questioning and resetting is normal and, in fact, vital in blogging.
I agree that there is a lot of lackluster content in the blogosphere, but that does not dilute the potency of the good stuff, the chicken and the cheese.
So write on, you paid professional in the world of letters and dear soul in the realm of mothers.
you couldn't have said it any better!!!!
I can't leave the blogging world alone because, day by day, it is evolving and watching it change -- and change how we communicate -- is fascinating. It's a big question, the one you raise. Will bloggers who try to be somewhat 'professional' (ie, develop an audience and then write for it) become more or less popular? Is authenticity (ie, 'truth in blogging') different? For me, the people I read regularly are the people whose voices I enjoy -- and I fight to find the time to look around for new treasures.
I am overjoyed that we seem to be overwhelming the 'professional arbiters' by forming these communities and taking one another's advice and recommendations. Who selected those precious few, anyway? An editor. Now we are all editors.
Great post Mrs.C. I will go and read the book, if only to be happily annoyed.
to me his argument seems as silly as the annoying mommy wars. he seems like he just basically fears that he simply isn't going to be "liked" as some bloggers are. maybe it is the power that blogging gives to readers and writers that scares him--it steals the spotlight from the academics and "professionals.
There is a lot of mediocre writing in the blogosphere, yes. But there's also plenty of mediocre writing in newspapers and magazines. Substandard blogs may receive occassional hits, but if the talent isn't there, people won't come back. There are a lot of very talented "amateur" writers out there, and limiting writing to the "professionals" soundds to cliquey to me.
I think you can only be true to yourself in what you write. Hopefully that is a sound enough basis.
Best wishes
Atta girl. We come to read you because we love you. The you that you put out there.
And the Poo!
They said the same thing about the camera (both analog and digital). All those amatuers were going to ruin everything.
Well in some ways I suppose they do ruin things for people trying to make it in industry. But it's more than merely blogs that have made it hard for the old guard to make a buck in the business. It's the corporations trying to squeeze every last drop of blood out of the stone. When they refused to even look at the options online, they dug their own grave.
I heard Andrew Keen speak a few months ago, and he described his book as a polemic. He intends to stir the pot, to bring the debate out into the open by using inflammatory (and often ridiculous) language. He was on a panel with Robert Scoble, Katie Hafner, and Dan Gillmor. He basically got his ass handed to him by the other panelists and the crowd. He made some valid points, but for the most part, essentially conceded that he himself is an amateur.
I wrote about it here: http://tinyurl.com/39oawk
The highlight was when my dear friend and professional bad-ass Grace Davis got up and said, "I don't know what internet you people are on, but to us in the mothers' community, we find something very different."
Great post.
I, for one, am so there.
Mr. Keen is full of crap.
kbX4jv Your blog is great. Articles is interesting!
dkzNiM Wonderful blog.
DfeNZb Please write anything else!
ES3hPH Magnific!
Good job!
Nice Article.
Wonderful blog.
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Please write anything else!
Good job!
Nice Article.
uoxT49 Thanks to author.
Good job!
Post a Comment