I teach writing, among other things. From day one of each course I teach, I emphasize that good writing requires, more than anything else, knowing your audience and being as specific and clear as possible. This last bit means using illustrative examples and polished prose. The first bit requires experience, insight, and intuition. If you lack any or all of those and still want to get a good grade, it requires meeting with your professor and asking, “What audience should I be writing for? What kind of language is appropriate? What counts as credible evidence?” Students who lack the intuition and who refuse to approach their professors often end up with mediocre grades that could have, should have, been better ones. These students assume that writing is this baffling room to which they have been barred access. They consider themselves blacklisted.Blogging, though, is so wonderfully, oddly, even frustratingly different. Because you don’t know your audience. Or, sometimes you know specific people in your audience (I know that my mom, my sister-in-law, my friend from yoga read what I write here) but not others.
When blogging, you’re writing your own audience. Creating it with each word you type, each image you project, each story you carefully (or not so carefully) craft. It’s such a postmodern-seeming concept it’s almost hard to wrap your head around:
Your audience doesn’t exist until you create it. The audience you get is the one you make.
It’s an extremely liberating idea, at first glance. I am allowed to write as if no one’s reading, to adapt a modern-day cliché. I can share things I wouldn’t ever usually share, and hide things I can’t usually hide.
But at the same time, I think very few of us write just for the sake of writing. As a friend of mine who feared that reading my blog was like reading my diary recently wrote, “if you didn't want anyone to read it you wouldn't publish it online.” She is so right. So that leads to the question: if I want an audience, how do I get it?
Sure, in a sense I write my audience, making conscious and unconscious decisions along the way: will I use profanity in my posts? talk about my sex life? my husband? when and how will I use humor? what styles of writing will I use in my posts? will I participate in contests, carnivals, etc.? will my posts usually be long or short? will I use photographs? personal ones? will I link to other blogs and websites, situating myself within a loosely defined community?
But in another real and equally strange sense, I must go find my audience. I have to find the right people – the people who will admire the choices I’ve made along the way, who will like my mix of humor and reflectiveness, who will care what I write – and I have to get them to my blog. Again and again.
My audience doesn’t exist until I create it, and in this case that means not just writing it but going out and finding it. Is this easier or harder than writing through more traditional channels? Is it easier to write a query letter to a major magazine, a local newspaper, or a well-established online zine than to work the web looking for an audience for your work? Maybe yes, maybe no.
But there definitely is something satisfying about going out and getting it yourself. Something very empowering about writing first, addressing audience second. I’m trying to think whether there are parallels and I think there are: painting, poetry, other forms of art whose purpose is expression before economics. I doubt many folks would put bloggers in the same category as they would Picasso, but in a very real way I think that blogging is – or can be – a very high form of personal expression.
Of art.
About Julie Green...
I am currently a Ph.D. student in English at The Ohio State University, where I study twentieth-century American literature and teach writing, literature, and film courses to undergraduates. I completed a B.S. in Communication at Cornell University and an M.A. in English at Ohio State. I was born and raised in Fairport, New York and moved to Columbus in 2003 with my now-husband, a lawyer at the Ohio Secretary of State's office. We were married in June 2005 and celebrated the birth of our first child on our second wedding anniversary.
7 comments:
I agree that there is something very empowering about creating your audience. Of considering writing first and audience second.
But what happens if you find yourself transitioning to writing for the audience you've created? Is that still writing for writing's sake? I know that the audience I'm writing for has changed over the year I've been blogging. I can see the stylistic changes when I read through old posts. Some of that was finding my own voice, but I think some of that is in response to my audience. I'd like to think I still write mostly for myself, but I wonder how much my audience unknowingly changes what or how I write.
DO you find the same thing?
Oh, I'm so glad to see this here! It's one of the best meta-blogging posts I've come across.
What is so appealing about blogging is that many aspects of it are still undefined. There is no reason blogging can't be art.
In my garden I paint with flowers, on my blog I paint with words. Though my words may only be read by a few, it is the fact that those few are moved in some way by them that I continue to write.
I love the immediate feedback of blogging and I know I would never receive that if I pursued a more traditional course of writing.
This post is just another example of why I love BlogRhet. Thank you for this thoughtful piece.
Excellent post and your are correct about creating your own audience, some with same writing styles, some with not.
Sometimes I'm writing as a parent, sometimes as a full fledged adult..
This was a great post..
You're right, of course, that a blogger creates audience much the way any writer does. Those who like the look of a book will read it. If the same author writes another book, a core group of those people will read it, too. Blogging simply accelerates this process.
But I also think LM's got a point. Once you've got that audience you created, it's tough not to succumb to writing for it.
To the point that Julie makes in the post and that LM and SM pick up: is writing to the audience a bad thing?
We've got this common denominator about "keeping art pure" with no commerce or pandering of any sort in conversation.
But I wonder, as someone whose career is built on pandering in writing, writing to the audience, is that corrupting?
I'd have a stack of manuscript submissions that I'd ignore simply because they weren't marketable at that time. Then I'd spend copious amounts of time perusing certain publications for writers to write on a marketable topic.
If your goal is to write for an audience at all, you're better off, in a way, writing to interest. The second way is to generate interest in your topic, which is a second hurdle.
Hmm I have more thoughts here but will have to try to string them out somehow...maybe if you guys answer and get me processing.
Julie
Using My Words
You're certainly right about having to 'find' your audience.
I certainly relate to the frustration of the 'unknown' audience.
The only way you gain 'knowledge' is by comments. I never realised how important they were.
Best wishes
Post a Comment