Saturday, August 25, 2007

Blogging - redefining friendship in the 2.0 world

How is blogging like keeping a pen-pal? Is it at all? Let's see: you can keep in touch, cross continents. There is often dialogues and confessions. Conversations are as likely to be continued via email, person to person, once contacts and trust has been established. It is arguably more convenient, also. One can choose to leave comments or not. One can choose not even to visit a blog or not anymore. That arguably leaves less evidence than of a hand-written relationship; of papers left in drawers, aged epistles which are proof of the owner’s lack of depth or patience.

I have a secret. When I was in primary school, there was an initiative to begin a pen-pal program with kids in America. Sexes were split between hats and our future correspondent was drawn as a lottery-- about as random a start to a relationship as any. Thus, many, I’m certain, were doomed from the start. Mine sure was. I do not remember much about my pen-pal, except that she lived in Ohio, and had the roundest, happiest writing I have ever seen and for years after associated with the personality of Americans as a whole. Did I respect her though? No. It was the writing; I have long had mistrust for people with nice penmanship (as those with appalling penmanship, like me, tend to do). So every time I got a letter on that pastel pink paper, peppered with love-hearts instead of dots on the ‘i’s, it made my young blood boil. Would it now? No.

But now I have other tastes to discriminate with.

If I am perusing new blogs and am in less than a benevolent mood, I could (and have) spent a good few minutes coveting their design, their owner’s ability to photoshop, their spacial abilities to be able to fit all their images and accoutrement's into the coding matrix. I can on mine, don't get me wrong, but that’s only because I paid someone to set it up to my liking in the first place. I sometimes feel like a fraud. I feel like I’m one of those domineering (male) bosses in those old movies, dictating speeches and letters to a secretary who is madly typing nearby, being the facilitator of information. What exactly have I done on my blog that is completely unique?

Which brings us to ‘voice’. Of course, our ‘voice’ is our own. No-one’s blog can be exactly like another for that reason. But I adulterate my voice at times, so how can my ‘friendships’ that are based upon the words which I write be fully legitimate? It’s like I’m friendly with ghosts, and they’re friendly with a simulacrum of me. I can see why such conferences as Blogher, then, are so vitally important. They give bloggers a chance to socialise face-to-face; in the ‘old-fashioned’ way. I’m sitting here, on the underside of the planet, where I guess I feel safe to wonder such things, but I wonder what women get out of meeting fellow bloggers? Do any get pinched by the little gremlin of jealousy? Of envy? Of awe? Do they get out of the experience all that they’ve hoped for?

I must admit; I've struggled this week. I've returned from a month's holiday, from (enforced and situational) unplugging. So, if I read your blog, you might've noticed I've not been around for a while. Or have you?

So the other night, I sat down to hundreds and hundreds of unread feeds from my favourite blogs. Do you know what I felt? Dread. A weight of unconquerable labour was gently massaging my head, about to drop completely. Could I really sift through all these posts? Did I want to? These people were my 'friends'. What did I do? I hit 'delete all'*; taking me back to nothingness.

It was a relief: so what in the hell kind of friend am I?



It doesn't seem I've changed very much from when I was a child, abandoning my long-distance pen-pal, does it? I would never knock on a RL friend's door after a month's absence, poke my head through, ask her what she's been up to for the past month, and when she's about to reply, I just put up my hand and say, "Hang on, not interested. Let's just continue our friendship from...now." So why do I do it online? And why am I confessing this secret here, where many of you are my friends, and I am fully expecting an irate retaliation (which I may or may not deserve).

What kind of friend are you? Do you do the same? How do you justify your blogging practice? Or have you been more sensible than I and decided not to follow any sort of self-imposed policy?

Or do you suspect, as I do, that I think way too much about all this. Fullstop. Period.



*On about 75% of them, as it turned out. I checked. But it's still a lot!

Crossposted at Miscellaneous Adventures of an Aussie Mum. Forgive me if I don't respond to comments today. I will be in at the Melbourne Writer's Festival and won't return until later. Then I will.

14 comments:

bubandpie said...

Well, by the same token, we don't return from vacation and then say to our friends, "When I'm home, we usually talk on the phone three times a week for twenty minutes. Since I was away for two weeks, that means we've got TWO HOURS of talking to do, and I'm not hanging up until we're done."

At least, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't do that if I ever went on vacation. Instead I'd do a quick catch-up - I'd find out the major updates, but I'd probably miss some of the finer details that I would have enjoyed hearing if I'd been home for the last two weeks. And that would be okay - because we're friends.

Kvetch said...

I am 43 and have had a penpal overseas since I was 9. Honestly, I find the immediate nature of the internet gives some 'relationships' a very casual feel. It's ok to respond, it's ok to delete. It's ok to email again when you're bored. I think that etiquette gets shoved aside many times. When or if you have ever received a letter, hand written, chances are, you responded. But not everyone does that with emails.

As for friendships, they do exist in cyberspace but I think that for the most part they are casual because of the nature of the medium.

Unfortunately, at this juncture in my life, I prefer many of my casual online friends to my IRL ones. But that's another post!

Lawyer Mama said...

Some people do take the reciprocal commenting and reading very seriously. I don't. I'm moved to read particular blogs because of the writing and the personalities and lives I've gotten to know. I comment to offer support or to add something to the conversation, not as a quid pro quo. So maybe I'm a bad blogger friend as well?

BlogHer was a surreal experience in that my two halves, my in person persona and my online persona, merged for the first time. It was nice to put voice and face and expression to the blogs I read every day, but it was almost like seeing a critically acclaimed movie made of one of your favorite novels. It was good, yes, but never exactly what you were expecting.

Snoskred said...

A thought provoking post - and I'm still mulling it over.

I am just grateful that I have found some of the people I have found via blogging. They have enriched my life in ways they will never know. ;)

Snoskred
http://www.snoskred.org/

Miscellaneous-Mum said...

B&P - yes, you're right, I think. Perhaps we charge too much into our blogging relationships due to the lack of personal reference. So the quick catch up like you say might be preferable to most people!

kvetch - first, great for you for keeping up the penpal! And, for me too, there have been times in my life where cyber friends have been more important too.

lawyer mom - I'm so relieved to hear your comment on reciprocal (or lack thereof) commenting. I don't either. I can't! But I think, also there's a difference between commenting, and communicating an opinion. The latter would be more indicative of a dialogue/discussion. If that makes sense??

snoskred - Hear, hear

Cecilieaux said...

Excellent! I've long thought the "community" aspect of cyberspace was oversold, even in the more intimate point-counterpoint world of e-mail lists, which is where you are actually conversing. We are all mild acquaintances until we meet in the flesh or begin to talk on the phone or make some real contact.

slouching mom said...

I think this is interesting. There are a small number (five to ten) bloggers about whom I can say with certainty that if they lived next door, they'd be good, even best, friends of mine.

I'd never delete posts from those people.

But the larger community, for whom I feel affection, to be sure -- I could easily delete its posts if I felt overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that had built up if, say, I'd been away.

It's maybe not so different from the way it is IRL. I have circles of friends -- the inner circle is composed of my dearest friends, and outer circles are composed of sometime friends, companions, and acquaintances.

mcewen said...

Well that just shows that you're too techy for you own good my dear.

Luddite types have our favourite blogs in the side bar as bookmarks. Much easier for the technically challenged.

Best wishes

Miscellaneous-Mum said...

Cecilieaux -"oversold" is a great term.

SM - yes, I'm the same. I did delete hundred and hundreds of posts, but like you I have my die-cast ones (more like a dozen though) that I read rain, hail or shine. I just have guilt about the others.

mcewan - I didn't mention those! I have those too - see my comment to SM above!

Christine said...

what sm said.

and snoskred also said what i feel. hey all my blog friends are mind readers!

gingajoy said...

delete, delete, delete, baby. I actually gave up on bloglines a long time ago, because that sense of pressure and dread you so well describe here became too much for me. So now I "check in" with folks I enjoy or "know" and follow commenters on some of my posts. It's haphazard and uneven, and potentially hurtful to some, but I realized a while back that I am not in the minority feeling this way--as our circles grow, so too does the sense of pressure. We have to learn to say no. To click on delete.

Julie Pippert said...

What's the question again?

What kind of friend am I? That's a good question. I'll let you know when I figure it out. I'd poll my friends but I suspect they'd all say different things.

The older and more stressed I've gotten has required me to re-evaluate what I think about things such as friends.

I think in the past I have undervalued friends in the way of their importance (as in took the good ones for granted), and overvalued acquaintances, and misvalued the dynamic between me and friends or alleged friends.

This lesson has transposed itself to my blogging, where I hope I keep things in perspective.

More less as some others have said, there is a sort of tiering in my mind to it all.

I don't think you're terrible for deleting after a vacation. I have way less faves than many people and still can't keep up many times (especially people who don't make my life easy by joining every reader and pinging daily LOL). I might do the same.

A lot of bloggers took extended times away this summer, and I just imagined they'd forget all they missed.

Julie
Ravin' Picture Maven

Miscellaneous-Mum said...

christine - you've obviously found a kindred community then ;) :)

gingajoy - babe, Im surprised you have time to do ANYTHING at the moment!

julie - everyone's off on summer vacation? Wow - imagine how my feeds could've looked if everyone was doing their usual quota!

Mary G said...

I'm really glad to read that failing to keep up is not unforgivable. I've been in a black hole, internet wise, for most of August and I was beat when I got home. Slept for two day straight. So I am only now starting to catch up. What I do is read back on my bloglist, so it takes a huge amount of time to get current again.
For me, a good friend is one to whom you can say 'I've been swamped lately' and get a positive response and the friendship carries on. Internet or real life.
MM, this is a really good post! Made me take a hard look at some assumptions.